<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM Web 2.0 goes to work and why Twitter is failing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.Bilal.ca/why-twitter-is-failing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.Bilal.ca/why-twitter-is-failing/</link>
	<description>scribblings about earning influence in the era of social web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilal Jaffery</title>
		<link>http://www.Bilal.ca/why-twitter-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-18231</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilal Jaffery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.Bilal.ca/?p=629#comment-18231</guid>
		<description>Gentlemen,

I agree that that I can filter out noise on twitter by adjusting my followers.  However, I had named twitter as one of the examples, I should&#039;ve ventured into other networks as examples.  

What about a real friend on facebook or linkedin who I would still like to keep as my connection but their constant messages, status changes and group postings on the network are almost spam like. I know on facebook, they have implemented filter ability based on what I would like to see on my timeline from certain individuals, but what about the rest of the networks?

This should be a normal &#039;best&#039; practise on every network and future networks to come. 

Maybe if twitter implemented a way for me to find a &#039;real&#039; expert on the topic based on the tweets and not their profile bio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentlemen,</p>
<p>I agree that that I can filter out noise on twitter by adjusting my followers.  However, I had named twitter as one of the examples, I should&#8217;ve ventured into other networks as examples.  </p>
<p>What about a real friend on facebook or linkedin who I would still like to keep as my connection but their constant messages, status changes and group postings on the network are almost spam like. I know on facebook, they have implemented filter ability based on what I would like to see on my timeline from certain individuals, but what about the rest of the networks?</p>
<p>This should be a normal &#8216;best&#8217; practise on every network and future networks to come. </p>
<p>Maybe if twitter implemented a way for me to find a &#8216;real&#8217; expert on the topic based on the tweets and not their profile bio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Earnhard</title>
		<link>http://www.Bilal.ca/why-twitter-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-18230</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Earnhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.Bilal.ca/?p=629#comment-18230</guid>
		<description>The rules for getting quality with Twitter are easy:

Follow the people who give you quality. 
If you&#039;re not getting quality from someone, stop following them.
If you get noisy @messages from someone, block them.
Pay attention to RTs, because they&#039;ll help you with #1 and #2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rules for getting quality with Twitter are easy:</p>
<p>Follow the people who give you quality.<br />
If you&#8217;re not getting quality from someone, stop following them.<br />
If you get noisy @messages from someone, block them.<br />
Pay attention to RTs, because they&#8217;ll help you with #1 and #2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.Bilal.ca/why-twitter-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-18229</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.Bilal.ca/?p=629#comment-18229</guid>
		<description>I am not sure I agree.  What you are showing is the same issue just using Lotus Connections, BeeHive, ManyEyes and CatTail (might have missed one).  You still have clutter, you still have the ability to weed out who you don&#039;t want in all systems.

If you are getting polluted with Internet marketing, then stop following, jsut as you would not consider their sources while in Connections.  It is all about filering and yes, finding the true experts.. However, it isn&#039;t what network you use most of the time, but how you use it.  Some of the small niche social network sites have stronger experts than 300,000 that have profiles, blogs and bookmarks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure I agree.  What you are showing is the same issue just using Lotus Connections, BeeHive, ManyEyes and CatTail (might have missed one).  You still have clutter, you still have the ability to weed out who you don&#8217;t want in all systems.</p>
<p>If you are getting polluted with Internet marketing, then stop following, jsut as you would not consider their sources while in Connections.  It is all about filering and yes, finding the true experts.. However, it isn&#8217;t what network you use most of the time, but how you use it.  Some of the small niche social network sites have stronger experts than 300,000 that have profiles, blogs and bookmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

